The main objective of this study was to determine the impact of Lactobacillus salivarius A3iob, a honey bee gut-associated strain (GenBank code access KX198010), on honey yield. Independent assays were conducted from May to September 2014 and 2015, in three commercial apiaries: Tilquiza, El Carmen and Yala, all located in north-western Argentina. Local Apis mellifera L. bees were kept in standard Langstroth hives; treated hives were fed once a month with 1×105 cfu/ml viable Lactobacillus cells, administered to the bees through a Doolittle-type feeder in 125 g/l sucrose syrup. Control hives were only given the syrup mixed with MRS sterile broth. The main honey harvest was done in December in all groups and we found that there was an overall increase in honey yield from the treated hives. In 2014, all treated hives produced between 2.3 to 6.5 times more honey than the controls. However, in 2015, higher honey average yields in the treated hives at El Carmen and Yala were obtained, yet not at Tilquiza, because of a slight mishap. They experienced the swarming of several bee colonies due to a higher number of bees without appropriate management, which caused the control group to yield more honey compared to the hives fed with Lactobacillus. Interestingly, at El Carmen, two honey harvests were recorded: one in winter and another in summer (July and December 2015, respectively). This unexpected result arose from the particular flora of the region, mainly Tithonia tubaeformis, which blooms in winter. L. salivarius A3iob cells prove to be a natural alternative that will positively impact the beekeepers’ economy by providing a higher honey yield.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Honey yield of different commercial apiaries treated with Lactobacillus salivarius A3iob, a new bee-probiotic strain
M. Novicov Fanciotti Related information
1Department of Applied Bacteriology, Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química (INIQUI-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Av. Bolivia 5150, Salta 4400, Argentina.
, M. Tejerina Related information2Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, UNJu, Alberdi 47, Barrio Los Naranjos, Jujuy 4600, Argentina.
, M.R. Benítez-Ahrendts Related information2Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, UNJu, Alberdi 47, Barrio Los Naranjos, Jujuy 4600, Argentina.
, M.C. Audisio Related information1Department of Applied Bacteriology, Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química (INIQUI-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Av. Bolivia 5150, Salta 4400, Argentina.
3Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Av. Bolivia 5150, A4402FDC Salta, Argentina.
*Corresponding author: audisio@unsa. edu. ar
3Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Av. Bolivia 5150, A4402FDC Salta, Argentina.
*Corresponding author: audisio@unsa.
Beneficial Microbes: 9
(2)- Pages: 291 - 298
Published Online: December 21, 2017
Abstract
Keywords: honey bee, probiotics, honey yield, Lactobacillus
2022 Journal Impact Factor
5.4
source: Journal Impact Factor 2023™ from Clarivate™
Institutional Offers
For institutional orders, please contact [email protected].
-
A.A. Hibberd, C.C. Yde, M.L. Ziegler, A.H. Honoré, M.T. Saarinen, S. Lahtinen, B. Stahl, H.M. Jensen and L.K. Stenman
-
E.E. Blaak, E.E. Canfora, S. Theis, G. Frost, A.K. Groen, G. Mithieux, A. Nauta, K. Scott, B. Stahl, J. van Harsselaar, R. van Tol, E.E. Vaughan and K. Verbeke
-
E. Arvidsson Nordström, C. Teixeira, C. Montelius, B. Jeppsson and N. Larsson
-
K. Venema, J. Verhoeven, C. Beckman and D. Keller
-
J.E. Haarhuis, A. Kardinaal and G.A.M. Kortman
-
E.E. Blaak, E.E. Canfora, S. Theis, G. Frost, A.K. Groen, G. Mithieux, A. Nauta, K. Scott, B. Stahl, J. van Harsselaar, R. van Tol, E.E. Vaughan and K. Verbeke
-
K. Lippert, L. Kedenko, L. Antonielli, I. Kedenko, C. Gemeier, M. Leitner, A. Kautzky-Willer, B. Paulweber and E. Hackl
-
K. Tsilingiri and M. Rescigno
-
M. Ozen and E.C. Dinleyici
-
Y. Kobayashi, T. Kuhara, M. Oki and J.-Z. Xiao

