We compared the effects of using three genomic relationship matrices and a pedigree based relationship matrix for optimum contribution selection (OCS) with a constraint on number of sires selected, on genetic gain, kinship and additive genetic variance. This was done by simulating a genomically selected small dairy cattle population. The cattle population underwent genomic selection for 11 generations. In total, 6,000 females and 2,500 males were genotyped per generation. We compared a pedigree-based matrix as well as VanRaden’s method 1 to construct genomic relationship matrices using either allele frequencies of the base population, of the current generation, or allele frequencies among all genotyped animals. The pedigree-based OCS resulted in higher kinship and more loss of genetic variance than using genomic OCS based on base population frequencies. Thus, genomic OCS with genomic relationship matrices using base population frequencies are preferable compared with pedigree-based OCS.
Proceedings of 12th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP)
Technical and species orientated innovations in animal breeding, and contribution of genetics to solving societal challenges
EditorsR.F. Veerkamp and Y. de Haas
Published: 2022 Pages: 3364
eISBN: 978-90-8686-940-4
Book Type: Conference Proceedings
671. Optimum contribution selection in a dairy cattle population with different relationship matrices
E. Gautason Related information
1Aarhus University, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
*Corresponding author: egill@au. dk
, G. Sahana Related information*Corresponding author: egill@au.
1Aarhus University, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
, B. Guldbrandtsen Related information2University of Copenhagen, Dept. of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Grønnegårdsvej 3, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
, P. Berg Related information1Aarhus University, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
3Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Oluf Thesens vei 6, 1433 Ås, Norway.
3Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Oluf Thesens vei 6, 1433 Ås, Norway.
Pages: 2769 - 2772
Published Online: February 09, 2023
Abstract: