Cover Image

The gestating and lactating sow


Books

Published: 

eISBN: 978-90-8686-803-2 | ISBN: 978-90-8686-253-5

Book Type: Edited Collection
Andersen, I.L., Berg, S., Boe, K.E. and Edwards, S., 2006. Positive handling in late pregnancy and the consequences for maternal behaviour and production in sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 99: 64-76.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, I.L., Haukvik, I.A. and Boe, K.E., 2009. Drying and warming immediately after birth may reduce piglet mortality in loose-housed sows. Animal 3: 592-597.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous, 2010. European declaration on alternatives to surgical castration of pigs on the invitation of the European Commission and the belgium presidency. Available at: www. alternativepig.eu/partnership/declaration.html. Google Scholar
Bateson, P., 1979. How do sensitive periods arise and what are they for? Animal Behaviour 27: 470-486.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berger, F., Dagorn, J., Le Denmat, M., Quillien, J.P., Vaudelet, J.C. and Signoret, J.P., 1997. Perinatal losses in outdoor pig breeding. A survey of factors influencing piglet mortality. Annales De Zootechnie 46: 321-329.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, X., Lensink, B.J., Tallet, C. and Veissier, I., 2003. Stockmanship and farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare 12: 479-492.
Google Scholar
Coleman, G.J., Hemsworth, P.H., Hay, M. and Cox, M., 2000. Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 11-20.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dellmeier, G.R. and Friend, T.H., 1991. Behaviour and extensive management of domestic sows (Sus scrofa) and litters. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 29: 327-341.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durier, V., Henry, S., Sankey, C., Sizun, J. and Hausberger, M., 2012. Locomotor inhibition in adult horses faced to stressors: a single postpartum experience may be enough! Frontiers in Psychology 3: 442.
Google Scholar
Eguchi, Y., Uetake, K. and Tanaka, T., 2007. Study of technical development using olfactory stimuli and auditory stimuli for behavior control of wild boar. Journal of Azabu University 15/16: 190-193.
Google Scholar
English, P.R., Grant, S.A., McPherson, O. and Edwards, S.A., 1999. Evaluation of the effects of the positive ‘befriending’ of sows and gilts (‘pleasant’ treatment) prior to parturition and in early lactation on sow behaviour, the process of parturition and piglet survival. In: Russel, A.J.F., Morgan, C.A., Savory, C.J., Appleby, M.C. and Lawrence, T.L.J. (eds.) Farm animal welfare – who writes the rules? Proceedings of an international symposium organized by The British Society of Animal Science, Edinburgh, UK, 1999. Occasional Publication – British Society of Animal Science, pp. 132-136. Google Scholar
Fiorelli, C., Mouret, S. and Porcher, J., 2012. Rationalities for working with animals: producing, living together and self-fulfilling. INRA Productions Animales 25: 181-192.
Google Scholar
Fowler, M., 2008. Restraint and handling of wild and domestic animals. Third edition. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 470 pp.
Google Scholar
Fredriksen, B., Font i Furnols, M., Lundström, K., Migdal, W., Prunier, A., Tuyttens, F.A.M. and Bonneau, M., 2009. Practice on castration of piglets in Europe. Animal 3: 1480-1487.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonyou, H.W., Hemsworth, P.H. and Barnett, J.L., 1986. Effects of frequent interactions with humans on growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 269-278.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T., 2010. How to improve livestock handling and reduce stress. In: Grandin, T. (ed.) Improving animal welfare – a practical approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 64-87.
Google Scholar
Grandinson, K., Rydhmer, L., Strandberg, E. and Thodberg, K., 2003. Genetic analysis of on-farm tests of maternal behaviour in sows. Livestock Production Science 83: 141-151.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hay, M., Vulin, A., Génin, S., Sales, P. and Prunier, A., 2003. Assessment of pain induced by castration in piglets: behavioral and physiological responses over the subsequent 5 days. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 82: 201-218.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Held, S., Mason, G. and Mendl, M., 2006. Maternal responsiveness of outdoor sows from first to fourth parities. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 98: 216-233.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., 2003. Human-animal interactions in livestock production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 185-198.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., 2007. Behavioural principles of pig handling. In: Grandin, T. (ed.) Livestock handling and transport. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp. 214-227.
Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H. and Barnett, J.L., 1991. The effects of aversively handling pigs, either individually or in groups, on their behaviour, growth and corticosteroids. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30: 61-72.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H. and Barnett, J.L., 1992. The effects of early contact with humans on the subsequent level of fear of humans in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 83-90.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., Barnett, J.L. and Campbell, R.G., 1996a. A study of the relative aversiveness of a new daily injection procedure for pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 389-401.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., Barnett, J.L. and Hansen, C., 1981a. The influence of handling by humans on the behavior, growth and corticosteroids in the juvenile female pig. Hormones and Behavior 15: 396-403.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., Barnett, J.L. and Hansen, C., 1986a. The influence of handling by humans on the behavior, reproduction and corticosteroids of male and feamle pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15: 303-314.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., Barnett, J.L. and Hansen, C., 1987. The influence of inconsistent handling by humans on the behaviour, growth and corticosteroids of young pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 245-252.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., Barnett, J.L., Coleman, G.J. and Hansen, C., 1989. A study of the relationships between the attitudinal and behavioural profiles of stockpersons and the level of fear of human and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 301-314.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., Barnett, J.L., Hansen, C. and Gonyou, H.W., 1986b. The influence of early contact with humans on subsequent behavioural response of pigs to humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15: 55-63.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., Brand, A. and Willems, P., 1981b. The behavioural response of sows to the presence of human beings and its relation to productivity. Livestock Production Science 8: 67-74.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H. and Coleman, G.J., 2011. Changing stockperson attitudes and behaviour. In: Hemsworth, P.H. and Coleman, G.J. (eds.) Human-livestock interactions: the stockperson and the productivity and welfare of intensively farmed animals. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp. 135-152.
Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., Coleman, G.J. and Barnett, J.L., 1994. Improving the attitude and behaviour of stockpersons towards pigs and the consequences on the behaviour and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 349-362.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., Gonyou, H.W. and Dziuk, P.J., 1986c. Human communication with pigs: the behavioural response of pigs to specific human signals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15: 45-54.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., Pedersen, V., Cox, M., Cronin, G.M. and Coleman, G.J., 1999. A note on the relationship between the behavioural response of lactating sows to humans and the survival of their piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 43-52.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P.H., Price, E.O. and Borgwardt, R., 1996b. Behavioural responses of domestic pigs and cattle to humans and novel stimuli. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 50: 43-56.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holyoake, P.K., Dial, G.D., Trigg, T. and King, V.L., 1995. Reducing pig mortality through supervision during the perinatal period. Journal of Animal Science 73: 3543-3551.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horrell, R.I., A’Ness, P.J.A., Edwards, S.A. and Eddison, J.C., 2001. The use of nose-rings in pigs: consequences for rooting, other functional activities, and welfare. Animal Welfare 10: 3-22.
Google Scholar
Hutson, G.D., Argent, M.F., Dickenson, L.G. and Luxford, B.G., 1992. Influence of parity and time since parturition on responsiveness of sows to a piglet distress call. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 303-313.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janczak, A.M., Pedersen, L.J., Rydhmer, L. and Bakken, M., 2003. Relation between early fear- and anxiety-related behaviour and maternal ability in sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 82: 121-135.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirkden, R.D., Broom, D.M. and Andersen, I.L., 2013. Piglet mortality: management solutions. Journal of Animal Science 91: 3361-3389.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lensink, B.J., Leruste, H., De Bretagne, T. and Bizeray-Filoche, D., 2009a. Sow behaviour towards humans during standard management procedures and their relationship to piglet survival. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 119: 151-157.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lensink, B.J., Leruste, H., Le Roux, T. and Bizeray-Filoche, D., 2009b. Relationship between the behaviour of sows at 6 months old and the behaviour and performance at farrowing. Animal 3: 128-134.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C.R.G., Hulbert, L.E. and McGlone, J.J., 2008. Novelty causes elevated heart rate and immune changes in pigs exposed to handling, alleys, and ramps. Livestock Science 116: 338-341.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marchant-Forde, J.N., Lay, Jr., D.C., McMunn, K.A., Cheng, H.W., Pajor, E.A. and Marchant-Forde, R.M., 2009. Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: the effects of alternative techniques delivered separately. Journal of Animal Science 87: 1479-1492.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miura, A., Tanida, H., Tanaka, T. and Yoshimoto, T., 1996. The influence of human posture and movement on the approach and escape behaviour of weanling pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 247-256.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nawroth, C., Ebersbach, M. and Von Borell, E., 2014. Juvenile domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) use human-given cues in an object choice task. Animal Cognition 17: 701-713.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, G.J., Rand, J.S., Priest, J., Ainscow, J. and Blackshaw, J.K., 1994. Behavioural observations of piglets undergoing tail docking, teeth clipping and ear notching. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 203-213.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paul, E.S. and Podberscek, A.L., 2000. Veterinary education and student's attitude towards animal welfare. Veterinary Records 149: 269-272.
Google Scholar
Pedersen, V., Barnett, J.L., Hemsworth, P.H., Newman, E.A. and Schirmer, B., 1998. The effects of handling on behavioural and physiological responses to housing in tether-stalls among pregnant pigs. Animal Welfare 7: 137-150.
Google Scholar
Porcher, J., 2011. The relationship between workers and animals in the pork industry: a shared suffering. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24: 3-17.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prunier, A., Bonneau, M., Von Borell, E.H., Cinotti, S., Gunn, M., Frediksen, B., Giersing, M., Morton, D.B., Tuyttens, F.A.M. and Velarde, A., 2006. A review of the welfare consequences of surgical castration in piglets and the evaluation of non-surgical methods. Animal Welfare 15: 277-289.
Google Scholar
Prunier, A., Lubac, S., Mejer, H., Roepstorff, A. and Edwards, S.A., 2014. Health, welfare and production problems in organic suckling piglets. Organic Agriculture 4: 107-121.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prunier, A., Mounier, A.M. and Hay, M., 2005. Effects of castration, tooth resection, or tail docking on plasma metabolites and stress hormones in young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 83: 216-222.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Puppe, B., Schon, P.C., Tuchscherer, A. and Manteuffel, G., 2005. Castration-induced vocalisation in domestic piglets, Sus scrofa: complex and specific alterations of the vocal quality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 95: 67-78.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ravel, A., D’Allaire, S. and Bigras-Poulin, M., 1996. Influence of management, housing and personality of the stockperson on preweaning performances on independent and integrated swine farms in Quebec. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 29: 37-57.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robert, S., De Passillé, A.M.B., St-Pierre, N., Dubreuil, P., Pelletier, G., Petitclerc, D. and Brazeau, P., 1989. Effect of the stress of injections on the serum concentration of cortisol, prolactin, and growth-hormone in gilts and lactating sows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 69: 663-672.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roguet, C., Renaud, H. and Duflot, B., 2011. Productivité du travail en elevage porcin: comparaison européenne et facteurs de variation. Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 43: 251-252.
Google Scholar
Rushen, J., Taylor, A.A. and De Passillé, A.M., 1999. Domestic animals’ fear of humans and its effect on their welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 285-303.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sbardella, P.E., Ulguim, R.R., Fontana, D.L., Ferrari, C.V., Bernardi, M.L., Wentz, I. and Bortolozzo, F.P., 2014. The post-cervical insemination does not impair the reproductive performance of primiparous sows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 49: 59-64.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sommavilla, R., Hoetzel, M.J. and Dalla Costa, O.A., 2011. Piglets’ weaning behavioural response is influenced by quality of human-animal interactions during suckling. Animal 5: 1426-1431.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, M.A., Bryer, P.J., Krebs, N. and McGlone, J.J., 2008. Tail docking in pigs: acute physiological and behavioural responses. Animal 2: 292-297.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tallet, C., Spinka, M., Maruscakova, I. and Simecek, P., 2010. Human perception of vocalizations of domestic piglets and modulation by experience with domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Journal of Comparative Psychology 124: 81-91.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talling, J.C., Waran, N.K., Wathes, C.M. and Lines, J.A., 1998. Sound avoidance by domestic pigs depends upon characteristics of the signal. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58: 255-266.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torrey, S., Devillers, N., Lessard, M., Farmer, C. and Widowski, T., 2009. Effect of age on the behavioral and physiological responses of piglets to tail docking and ear notching. Journal of Animal Science 87: 1778-1786.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A.I., Hemsworth, P.H. and Tilbrook, A.J., 2005. Susceptibility of reproduction in female pigs to impairment by stress or elevation of cortisol. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 29: 398-410.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vangen, O., Holm, B., Valros, A., Lund, M.S. and Rydhmer, L., 2005. Genetic variation in sows’ maternal behaviour, recorded under field conditions. Livestock Production Science 93: 63-71.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Von Borell, E., Baumgartner, J., Giersing, M., Jäggin, N., Prunier, A., Tuyttens, F.A.M. and Edwards, S.A., 2009. Animal welfare implications of surgical castration and its alternatives in pigs. Animal 3: 1488-1496.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Von Borell, E., Dobson, H. and Prunier, A., 2007. Stress, behaviour and reproductive performance in female cattle and pigs. Hormones and Behavior 52: 130-138.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weary, D.M., Braithwaite, L.A. and Fraser, D., 1998a. Vocal response to pain in piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56: 161-172.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weary, D.M. and Fraser, D., 1995. Signalling need: costly signals and animal welfare assessment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 159-169.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weary, D.M., Phillips, P.A., Pajor, E.A., Fraser, D. and Thompson, B.K., 1998b. Crushing of piglets by sows: effects of litter features, pen features and sow behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 61: 103-111.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, C., 2008. A review of welfare in cattle, sheep and pig lairages, with emphasis on stocking rates, ventilation and noise. Animal Welfare 17: 275-284.
Google Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F., 2007. How animals communicate quality of life: the qualitative assessment of behaviour. Animal Welfare 16: 25-31.
Google Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F., Batchelor, C., Jarvis, S., Farish, M. and Calvert, S., 2003. The relationship between qualitative and quantitative assessments of pig behaviour. In: Zootecniche, F.I.Z.e. (ed.) Proceedings of the 37th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Brescia, Italy, p. 42. Google Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F., Hunter, A.E., Paul, E.S. and Lawrence, A.B., 2012. Assessing pig body language: agreement and consistency between pig farmers, veterinarians, and animal activists. Journal of Animal Science 90: 3652-3665.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F., Hunter, E.A., Mendl, M.T. and Lawrence, A.B., 2000. The spontaneous qualitative assessment of behavioural expressions in pigs: first explorations of a novel methodology for integrative animal welfare measurement. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67: 193-215.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, R.G., Deshazer, J.A., Tressler, C.J., Borcher, G.M., Davey, S., Waninge, A., Parkhurst, A.M., Milanuk, M.J. and Clemens, E.T., 1995. Vocalization and physiological response of pigs during castration with or without a local anesthetic. Journal of Animal Science 73: 381-386.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Related titles:

Selenium in pig nutrition and health Understanding and combatting African Swine Fever Cover image The suckling and weaned piglet Cover image The value of fibre Cover image The gestating and lactating sow Poultry and pig nutrition Cover image Energy and Protein Metabolism and Nutrition Cover image Insects as food and feed: from production to consumption Cover image Phytate destruction - consequences for precision animal nutrition Cover image Weaning the pig

New titles

Institutional Offers

For institutional orders, please contact [email protected].

Purchase Options